State v. Sanders

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Sanders

295 S.W.3d 227, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1477, 2009 WL 3364258

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 20, 2009·No. ED 92004·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James Edward Sanders (“defendant”) appeals the judgment on his conviction of two counts of possession of a controlled substance. Defendant claims there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James Edward Sanders (“defendant”) appeals the judgment on his conviction of two counts of possession of a controlled substance. Defendant claims there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Sanders, 295 S.W.3d 227, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1477, 2009 WL 3364258 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

295 S.W.3d 227 (State v. Sanders) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related