State v. Sanders

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Sanders

308 S.W.3d 329, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 527, 2010 WL 1655809

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 27, 2010·No. WD 69576·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Myron Sanders appeals his convictions for murder in the second degree, section 565.021, RSMo 2000, armed criminal action, section 571.015, RSMo 2000, and resisting arrest, section 575.150, RSMo Cum. Supp.2007. He contends that there was insufficient evidence to support a conviction for resisting arrest and that the trial court plainly erred in allowing a forensic examiner to testify that another examiner verified her fingerprint analysis. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The convictions are affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Myron Sanders appeals his convictions for murder in the second degree, section 565.021, RSMo 2000, armed criminal action, section 571.015, RSMo 2000, and resisting arrest, section 575.150, RSMo Cum. Supp.2007. He contends that there was insufficient evidence to support a conviction for resisting arrest and that the trial court plainly erred in allowing a forensic examiner to testify that another examiner verified her fingerprint analysis. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The convictions are affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Sanders, 308 S.W.3d 329, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 527, 2010 WL 1655809 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

308 S.W.3d 329 (State v. Sanders) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related