Jackson v. State

308 S.W.3d 329, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 521, 2010 WL 1655833
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 27, 2010·No. WD 70503·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Elmer Jackson appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing in the Circuit Court of Boone County. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. No *330 jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson v. State, 308 S.W.3d 329, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 521, 2010 WL 1655833 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

308 S.W.3d 329 (Jackson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Sanders
308 S.W.3d 329 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)