Jones v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Jones v. State

260 S.W.3d 372, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 136, 2008 WL 220193

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 29, 2008

DocketWD 67709

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 260 S.W.3d 372 (Jones v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jones v. State, 260 S.W.3d 372, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 136, 2008 WL 220193 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Mark Jones (“Jones”) appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentia-ry hearing where he claimed that he was denied his constitutional right to represent himself because of the ineffectiveness of his trial counsel.

Having reviewed the record on appeal, the court finds that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion, and the judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Mark Jones (“Jones”) appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentia-ry hearing where he claimed that he was denied his constitutional right to represent himself because of the ineffectiveness of his trial counsel.

Having reviewed the record on appeal, the court finds that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion, and the judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

260 S.W.3d 372, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 136, 2008 WL 220193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-state-moctapp-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack