Jones v. State
260 S.W.3d 372, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 136, 2008 WL 220193
Opinion
ORDER
Mark Jones (“Jones”) appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentia-ry hearing where he claimed that he was denied his constitutional right to represent himself because of the ineffectiveness of his trial counsel.
Having reviewed the record on appeal, the court finds that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion, and the judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jones v. State, 260 S.W.3d 372, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 136, 2008 WL 220193 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
260 S.W.3d 372 (Jones v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Holman v. State
260 S.W.3d 372 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)