Holman v. State
260 S.W.3d 372, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 133, 2008 WL 220189
Opinion
ORDER
David J. Holman appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for ineffective assistance of counsel. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no precedential or jurisprudential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. Judgment affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Holman v. State, 260 S.W.3d 372, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 133, 2008 WL 220189 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
260 S.W.3d 372 (Holman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jones v. State
260 S.W.3d 372 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)