Holman v. State

260 S.W.3d 372, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 133, 2008 WL 220189
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 29, 2008
DocketWD 67644
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 260 S.W.3d 372 (Holman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holman v. State, 260 S.W.3d 372, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 133, 2008 WL 220189 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

ORDER

David J. Holman appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for ineffective assistance of counsel. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no precedential or jurisprudential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. Judgment affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jones v. State
260 S.W.3d 372 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
260 S.W.3d 372, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 133, 2008 WL 220189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holman-v-state-moctapp-2008.