Jones v. State

232 S.W.3d 608, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1214, 2007 WL 2471627
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jones v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1159
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 4, 2007·No. ED 88825·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Benjamin Jones appeals from the trial court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.035 1 motion for postconviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k); Kniest v. State, 133 S.W.3d 70, 71 (Mo. App. E.D.2003). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum *609 setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2006, unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. State, 232 S.W.3d 608, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1214, 2007 WL 2471627 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

232 S.W.3d 608 (Jones v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kniest v. State
133 S.W.3d 70 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2003)