Kniest v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Kniest v. State

120 S.W.3d 248, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1705, 2003 WL 22434124

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 28, 2003

DocketNo. ED 82311

StatusPublished

This text of 120 S.W.3d 248 (Kniest v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kniest v. State, 120 S.W.3d 248, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1705, 2003 WL 22434124 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, George M. Kniest, appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evi-dentiary hearing. He alleged his plea counsel provided ineffective assistance by waiving a pre-sentence investigation' and by failing to present mitigation evidence.

[249]*249Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, George M. Kniest, appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evi-dentiary hearing. He alleged his plea counsel provided ineffective assistance by waiving a pre-sentence investigation' and by failing to present mitigation evidence.

[249]*249Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

120 S.W.3d 248, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1705, 2003 WL 22434124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kniest-v-state-moctapp-2003.