Jones v. State

348 S.W.3d 134, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1179, 2011 WL 4357821
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jones v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 434
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 13, 2011·No. ED 95269·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Rafael A. Jones (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.035 after an evidentiary hearing. The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value and we affirm by written order. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. State, 348 S.W.3d 134, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1179, 2011 WL 4357821 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

348 S.W.3d 134 (Jones v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.