Jones v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Jones v. State

356 S.W.3d 838, 2012 WL 70620, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 19

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 10, 2012

DocketED 95931

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 356 S.W.3d 838 (Jones v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jones v. State, 356 S.W.3d 838, 2012 WL 70620, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 19 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Alphonso Jones (Movant) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Movant claims that the motion court clearly erred in denying his Rule 24.035 motion because he did not understand the significance of entering a blind plea.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the motion court’s decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

*839 We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI