Jones v. State

351 S.W.3d 784, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1133, 2011 WL 3807547
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jones v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 434
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 30, 2011·No. ED 95175·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Omari Jones (Movant) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County denying his amended Rule 24.085 motion. Movant argues that the motion court clearly erred in denying his claim that an insufficient factual basis existed for the plea court to accept his Alford plea.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court’s decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. State, 351 S.W.3d 784, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1133, 2011 WL 3807547 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

351 S.W.3d 784 (Jones v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Leeper v. SCORPIO SUPPLY IV, LLC
351 S.W.3d 784 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)