Jones v. State

354 S.W.3d 258, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1661, 2011 WL 6296766
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 13, 2011·No. ED 96404·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Tommie Lee Jones appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 1 motion. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(h), (k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2011, unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. State, 354 S.W.3d 258, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1661, 2011 WL 6296766 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

354 S.W.3d 258 (Jones v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

NEIL-WALDROP v. Waldrop
354 S.W.3d 258 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)