Home/Missouri Court of Appeals/Vice v. State

Vice v. State

345 S.W.3d 398, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1066, 2011 WL 3569822
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedAugust 16, 2011
DocketED 95525
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 345 S.W.3d 398 (Vice v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vice v. State, 345 S.W.3d 398, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1066, 2011 WL 3569822 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Chad Vice appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 1 motion. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2011, unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jones v. State
345 S.W.3d 398 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
345 S.W.3d 398, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1066, 2011 WL 3569822, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vice-v-state-moctapp-2011.