Vice v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Vice v. State

391 S.W.3d 496, 2013 WL 324260, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 127

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Vice v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1066 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 29, 2013·No. No. WD 74220·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Chad Vice appeals from the Circuit Court of Callaway County’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Chad Vice appeals from the Circuit Court of Callaway County’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Vice v. State, 391 S.W.3d 496, 2013 WL 324260, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 127 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

391 S.W.3d 496 (Vice v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.