Exxon Corp. v. Butler

619 S.W.2d 399, 24 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 391, 68 Oil & Gas Rep. 701, 1981 Tex. LEXIS 338
Texas Supreme Court·Decided May 13, 1981·No. B-8779·Published·Cited by 19 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The parties, after a writ of error was granted by this Court, have informed the Court that the cause has been settled. They have filed a joint motion to dismiss.

It is, therefore, ordered that the joint motion to dismiss be, and hereby is granted; and the cause is dismissed as moot.

It is further ordered that the judgments of the courts below be, and hereby are, set aside. 585 S.W.2d 881 (Tex.Civ.App.).

Pursuant to the agreement of the parties, it is ordered that the petitioner, Exxon Corporation, pay all costs incurred in this Court, in the Court of Civil Appeals, and in the District Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Exxon Corp. v. Butler, 619 S.W.2d 399, 24 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 391, 68 Oil & Gas Rep. 701, 1981 Tex. LEXIS 338 (Tex. 1981).

619 S.W.2d 399 (Exxon Corp. v. Butler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cogema Mining, Inc. v. Gilberto Guzman
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2001
in Re Estate of Raymond S. De Leon
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2001
Denise Robino v. Aaron Mills
Court of Appeals of Texas, 1998
Claridge v. Dream Homes, Inc.
966 S.W.2d 729 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1998)
Panterra Corp. v. American Dairy Queen
908 S.W.2d 300 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1995)
City of San Antonio v. San Antonio Independent School District
683 S.W.2d 67 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1984)