Gerald Bracete v. Robert Neighbors and Cynthia Neighbors

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 11, 2001·No. 04-00-00803-CV·Published

Opinion

No. 04-00-00803-CV

Gerald
BRACETE,

Appellant

v.

Robert
NEIGHBORS & Cynthia Neighbors,

Appellees

From the County Court at Law No. 2, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 255720

Honorable Jo Ann S. De Hoyos, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Paul W. Green, Justice

Sarah B. Duncan, Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 11, 2001

JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED

The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal, stating that they have fully compromised and settled all issues in dispute. The motion is granted. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). Because the cause is moot, all previous orders and judgments, both trial and appellate, are set aside and the cause is dismissed. See Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Hughes, 827 S.W.2d 859, 859 (Tex. 1992); Exxon Corp. v. Butler, 619 S.W.2d 399, 399 (Tex. 1981); Freeman v. Burrows, 141 Tex. 318, 171 S.W.2d 863, 863-64 (1943); Panterra v. American Dairy Queen, 908 S.W.2d 300, 301 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1995, no writ). Costs of appeal are taxed against the parties who incurred them.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gerald Bracete v. Robert Neighbors and Cynthia Neighbors, (Tex. Ct. App. 2001).

Gerald Bracete v. Robert Neighbors and Cynthia Neighbors (Gerald Bracete v. Robert Neighbors and Cynthia Neighbors) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Exxon Corp. v. Butler
619 S.W.2d 399 (Texas Supreme Court, 1981)
Panterra Corp. v. American Dairy Queen
908 S.W.2d 300 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1995)
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, & Smith, Inc. v. Hughes
827 S.W.2d 859 (Texas Supreme Court, 1992)
Freeman v. Burrows
171 S.W.2d 863 (Texas Supreme Court, 1943)