Cogema Mining, Inc. v. Gilberto Guzman
This text of Cogema Mining, Inc. v. Gilberto Guzman (Cogema Mining, Inc. v. Gilberto Guzman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
No. 04-00-00369-CV
COGEMA MINING, INC.,
Appellant
v.
Gilberto GUZMAN,
Appellee
From the 229th Judicial District Court, Duval County, Texas
Trial Court No. DC-99-48
Honorable Alex W. Gabert, Judge Presiding
Per Curiam
Sitting: Alma L. López, Justice
Catherine Stone, Justice
Paul W. Green, Justice
Delivered and Filed: June 20, 2001
DISMISSED
The appellant has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal, stating that the parties have settled all issues in dispute. The motion is granted. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). Because the cause is moot, all previous orders and judgments, both trial and appellate, are set aside and the cause is dismissed. See Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Hughes, 827 S.W.2d 859, 859 (Tex. 1992); Exxon Corp. v. Butler, 619 S.W.2d 399, 399 (Tex. 1981); Freeman v. Burrows, 141 Tex. 318, 171 S.W.2d 863, 863-64 (1943); Panterra Corp. v. American Dairy Queen, 908 S.W.2d 300, 301 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1995, no writ). Costs of appeal are taxed against the parties who incurred them.
DO NOT PUBLISH
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Cogema Mining, Inc. v. Gilberto Guzman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cogema-mining-inc-v-gilberto-guzman-texapp-2001.