Cogema Mining, Inc. v. Gilberto Guzman

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 20, 2001·No. 04-00-00369-CV·Published

Opinion

No. 04-00-00369-CV

COGEMA MINING, INC.,

Appellant

v.

Gilberto GUZMAN,

Appellee

From the 229th Judicial District Court, Duval County, Texas

Trial Court No. DC-99-48

Honorable Alex W. Gabert, Judge Presiding

Per Curiam

Sitting: Alma L. López, Justice

Catherine Stone, Justice

Paul W. Green, Justice

Delivered and Filed: June 20, 2001

DISMISSED

The appellant has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal, stating that the parties have settled all issues in dispute. The motion is granted. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). Because the cause is moot, all previous orders and judgments, both trial and appellate, are set aside and the cause is dismissed. See Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Hughes, 827 S.W.2d 859, 859 (Tex. 1992); Exxon Corp. v. Butler, 619 S.W.2d 399, 399 (Tex. 1981); Freeman v. Burrows, 141 Tex. 318, 171 S.W.2d 863, 863-64 (1943); Panterra Corp. v. American Dairy Queen, 908 S.W.2d 300, 301 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1995, no writ). Costs of appeal are taxed against the parties who incurred them.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cogema Mining, Inc. v. Gilberto Guzman, (Tex. Ct. App. 2001).

Cogema Mining, Inc. v. Gilberto Guzman (Cogema Mining, Inc. v. Gilberto Guzman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Exxon Corp. v. Butler
619 S.W.2d 399 (Texas Supreme Court, 1981)
Panterra Corp. v. American Dairy Queen
908 S.W.2d 300 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1995)
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, & Smith, Inc. v. Hughes
827 S.W.2d 859 (Texas Supreme Court, 1992)
Freeman v. Burrows
171 S.W.2d 863 (Texas Supreme Court, 1943)