Denise Robino v. Aaron Mills

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 14, 1998·No. 04-98-00324-CV·Published

Opinion

No. 04-98-00324-CV


Denise ROBINO, et al.,
Appellants


v.


Aaron MILLS, et al.,
Appellees


From the 239th Judicial District Court, Brazoria County, Texas
Trial Court No. 96-G-2072
Honorable J. Ray Gayle, Judge Presiding


PER CURIAM

Sitting: Phil Hardberger, Chief Justice

Tom Rickhoff, Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 14, 1998

JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED



The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal, stating that they have fully compromised and settled all issues in dispute. The motion is granted. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). Because the cause is moot, all previous orders and judgments, both trial and appellate, are set aside and the cause is dismissed. See Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Hughes, 827 S.W.2d 859, 859 (Tex. 1992); Exxon Corp. v. Butler, 619 S.W.2d 399, 399 (Tex. 1981); Freeman v. Burrows, 171 S.W.2d 863, 863-64 (1943); Panterra v. American Dairy Queen, 908 S.W.2d 300, 301 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1995, no writ). Costs of appeal are taxed against the parties who incurred them.

DO NOT PUBLISH


Return to
4th Court of Appeals Opinions

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Denise Robino v. Aaron Mills, (Tex. Ct. App. 1998).

Denise Robino v. Aaron Mills (Denise Robino v. Aaron Mills) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Exxon Corp. v. Butler
619 S.W.2d 399 (Texas Supreme Court, 1981)
Panterra Corp. v. American Dairy Queen
908 S.W.2d 300 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1995)
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, & Smith, Inc. v. Hughes
827 S.W.2d 859 (Texas Supreme Court, 1992)
Freeman v. Burrows
171 S.W.2d 863 (Texas Supreme Court, 1943)