Lola Boyce, M.D. v. Amica Mutual Insurance Company and Crawford & Company Insurance Adjusters
This text of Lola Boyce, M.D. v. Amica Mutual Insurance Company and Crawford & Company Insurance Adjusters (Lola Boyce, M.D. v. Amica Mutual Insurance Company and Crawford & Company Insurance Adjusters) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Alma L. López, Justice
Catherine Stone, Justice
Paul W. Green, Justice
Delivered and Filed: April 26, 2000
APPEAL DISMISSED
The appellant in the above numbered and styled appeal has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, stating that the parties have reached an agreement to settle and compromise their differences in the underlying lawsuit. The motion is granted. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). Because the case is now moot, all previous orders and judgments, both trial and appellate, are set aside and the cause is dismissed. See Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Hughes, 827 S.W.2d 859, 859 (Tex. 1992); Exxon Corp. v. Bulter, 619 S.W.2d 399, 399 (Tex. 1981); Panterra v. American Dairy Queen, 908 S.W.2d 300, 301 (Tex. App.-San Antonio 1995, no writ.). The costs of this appeal are taxed against the party who incurred them.
DO NOT PUBLISH
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lola Boyce, M.D. v. Amica Mutual Insurance Company and Crawford & Company Insurance Adjusters, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lola-boyce-md-v-amica-mutual-insurance-company-and-texapp-2000.