Lola Boyce, M.D. v. Amica Mutual Insurance Company and Crawford & Company Insurance Adjusters

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 26, 2000·No. 04-99-00589-CV·Published

Opinion

No. 04-99-00589-CV
Dr. Lola BOYCE,
Appellant
v.
AMICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,
Appellee
From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 96-CI-17409
Honorable Andy Mireles, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Alma L. López, Justice

Catherine Stone, Justice

Paul W. Green, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 26, 2000

APPEAL DISMISSED

The appellant in the above numbered and styled appeal has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, stating that the parties have reached an agreement to settle and compromise their differences in the underlying lawsuit. The motion is granted. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). Because the case is now moot, all previous orders and judgments, both trial and appellate, are set aside and the cause is dismissed. See Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Hughes, 827 S.W.2d 859, 859 (Tex. 1992); Exxon Corp. v. Bulter, 619 S.W.2d 399, 399 (Tex. 1981); Panterra v. American Dairy Queen, 908 S.W.2d 300, 301 (Tex. App.-San Antonio 1995, no writ.). The costs of this appeal are taxed against the party who incurred them.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lola Boyce, M.D. v. Amica Mutual Insurance Company and Crawford & Company Insurance Adjusters, (Tex. Ct. App. 2000).

Lola Boyce, M.D. v. Amica Mutual Insurance Company and Crawford & Company Insurance Adjusters (Lola Boyce, M.D. v. Amica Mutual Insurance Company and Crawford & Company Insurance Adjusters) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Exxon Corp. v. Butler
619 S.W.2d 399 (Texas Supreme Court, 1981)
Panterra Corp. v. American Dairy Queen
908 S.W.2d 300 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1995)
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, & Smith, Inc. v. Hughes
827 S.W.2d 859 (Texas Supreme Court, 1992)