Texas Water Commission v. Coalition Advocating a Safe Environment

Texas Supreme Court

Texas Water Commission v. Coalition Advocating a Safe Environment

819 S.W.2d 799, 35 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 160, 1991 Tex. LEXIS 139

CourtTexas Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 20, 1991

DocketD-0713

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 819 S.W.2d 799 (Texas Water Commission v. Coalition Advocating a Safe Environment) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Texas Water Commission v. Coalition Advocating a Safe Environment, 819 S.W.2d 799, 35 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 160, 1991 Tex. LEXIS 139 (Tex. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After this Court granted writ of error on two applications in this case, the parties informed the Court that they had settled the issues between them. In a joint motion they request that the judgment and opinion of the court of appeals and the judgment of the district court be vacated, and that this cause be dismissed as moot. The motion does not state whether the parties have agreed to the allocation of costs.

The joint motion is granted. In accordance with the agreement of the parties, the judgment of the court of appeals and its opinion reported at 798 S.W.2d 639 are vacated; the judgment of the district court is vacated; and the cause is dismissed as moot. Exxon v. Butler, 619 S.W.2d 399 (Tex.1981); United Services Auto Ass’n v. Lederle, 400 S.W.2d 749 (Tex.1966); TEX.R.APP.P. 133(b). Costs are taxed against petitioners.

GAMMAGE, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

After this Court granted writ of error on two applications in this case, the parties informed the Court that they had settled the issues between them. In a joint motion they request that the judgment and opinion of the court of appeals and the judgment of the district court be vacated, and that this cause be dismissed as moot. The motion does not state whether the parties have agreed to the allocation of costs.

The joint motion is granted. In accordance with the agreement of the parties, the judgment of the court of appeals and its opinion reported at 798 S.W.2d 639 are vacated; the judgment of the district court is vacated; and the cause is dismissed as moot. Exxon v. Butler, 619 S.W.2d 399 (Tex.1981); United Services Auto Ass’n v. Lederle, 400 S.W.2d 749 (Tex.1966); TEX.R.APP.P. 133(b). Costs are taxed against petitioners.

GAMMAGE, J., not sitting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

819 S.W.2d 799, 35 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 160, 1991 Tex. LEXIS 139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/texas-water-commission-v-coalition-advocating-a-safe-environment-tex-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack