United Services Automobile Association v. Lederle

Texas Supreme Court

United Services Automobile Association v. Lederle

400 S.W.2d 749

CourtTexas Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 23, 1966

DocketA-11102

StatusPublished

Cited by16 cases

This text of 400 S.W.2d 749 (United Services Automobile Association v. Lederle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United Services Automobile Association v. Lederle, 400 S.W.2d 749 (Tex. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals is reported in 394 SW.2d 31. We granted writ of error to review the holdings made by the Court of Civil Appeals and its judgment declaring the rights and duties of the parties.

The parties have now filed a joint motion to dismiss the applications for writ of error filed by both parties, asserting in their motion that all matters in controversy have been compromised and settled.

The cause is moot. To dismiss the applications would permit the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals to become a final judgment in a moot case. No reason is made known to us and none appears in the record to cause us to vary from the rule that a moot cause should be dismissed. See University Interscholastic League v. Sims, 133 Tex. 605, 131 S.W.2d 94 (1939); International Ass’n of Machinists, Local Union No. 1488 et al. v. Federated Ass’n of Accessory Workers et al., 133 Tex. 624, 130 S.W.2d 282 (1939); City of Western University Place v. Martin, 132 Tex, 354, 123 S.W.2d 638 (1939).

• It is accordingly ordered that the judgments of the courts below be vacated and that this cause be, and the same is hereby, dismissed with costs assessed according to the agreement of the parties.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals is reported in 394 SW.2d 31. We granted writ of error to review the holdings made by the Court of Civil Appeals and its judgment declaring the rights and duties of the parties.

The parties have now filed a joint motion to dismiss the applications for writ of error filed by both parties, asserting in their motion that all matters in controversy have been compromised and settled.

The cause is moot. To dismiss the applications would permit the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals to become a final judgment in a moot case. No reason is made known to us and none appears in the record to cause us to vary from the rule that a moot cause should be dismissed. See University Interscholastic League v. Sims, 133 Tex. 605, 131 S.W.2d 94 (1939); International Ass’n of Machinists, Local Union No. 1488 et al. v. Federated Ass’n of Accessory Workers et al., 133 Tex. 624, 130 S.W.2d 282 (1939); City of Western University Place v. Martin, 132 Tex, 354, 123 S.W.2d 638 (1939).

• It is accordingly ordered that the judgments of the courts below be vacated and that this cause be, and the same is hereby, dismissed with costs assessed according to the agreement of the parties.

Texas Quarter Horse Association Texas Thoroughbred Association Texas Horsemen's Partnership Gillespie County Fair and Festivals Association, Inc.et Al. // American Legion Department of Texas v. American Legion Department of Texas, Temple Post 133 Kickapoo Traditional Tribe of Texas Thompson Allstate Bingo Supply, Inc. And Moore Supplies, Inc.// Texas Quarter Horse

496 S.W.3d 175 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2016)

Ex Parte Hopper

736 So. 2d 529 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1999)

Panterra Corp. v. American Dairy Queen

908 S.W.2d 300 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1995)

Texas Water Commission v. Coalition Advocating a Safe Environment

819 S.W.2d 799 (Texas Supreme Court, 1991)

Spence v. Baldwin County Sav. & Loan Ass'n

533 So. 2d 192 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1988)

Gannon v. Payne

706 S.W.2d 304 (Texas Supreme Court, 1986)

Laker Airways Limited, a Foreign Corporation v. Sabena, Belgian World Airlines, a Foreign Corporation Klm, Royal Dutch Airlines, a Foreign Corporation, Laker Airways Limited, a Foreign Corporation v. Sabena, Belgian World Airlines, a Foreign Corporation, Klm, Royal Dutch Airlines, a Foreign Corporation

731 F.2d 909 (D.C. Circuit, 1984)

Laker Airways Ltd. v. Sabena, Belgian World Airlines

731 F.2d 909 (D.C. Circuit, 1984)

State v. Lodge

608 S.W.2d 910 (Texas Supreme Court, 1980)

Robertson v. Estate of McKnight

591 S.W.2d 639 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1979)

Harrison v. Energy Gathering, Inc.

511 S.W.2d 78 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1974)

Romero v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

264 So. 2d 258 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1972)

Reeves v. Rodriguez

458 S.W.2d 546 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1970)

Duke v. Sears Roebuck Co.

446 S.W.2d 886 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

400 S.W.2d 749, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-services-automobile-association-v-lederle-tex-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack