Claridge v. Dream Homes, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Claridge v. Dream Homes, Inc.

966 S.W.2d 729, 1998 Tex. App. LEXIS 1693, 1998 WL 124646

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedMarch 18, 1998

DocketNo. 04-96-00312-CV

StatusPublished

This text of 966 S.W.2d 729 (Claridge v. Dream Homes, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claridge v. Dream Homes, Inc., 966 S.W.2d 729, 1998 Tex. App. LEXIS 1693, 1998 WL 124646 (Tex. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinions

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal, stating that they have fully compromised and settled all issues in dispute. The motion is granted. See Tex. R.App. P. 42.1(a)(1). Because the cause is moot, all previous orders and judgments, both trial and appellate, are set aside and the cause is dismissed. See Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Hughes, 827 S.W.2d 859, 859 (Tex.1992); Exxon Corp. v. Butler, 619 S.W.2d 399, 399 (Tex.1981); Freeman v. Burrows, 141 Tex. 318, 171 S.W.2d 863, 863-64 (1943); Panterra v. American Dairy Queen, 908 S.W.2d 300, 301 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1995, no writ). Costs of appeal are taxed against the parties who incurred them. The majority and dissenting opinions of this court dated January 21, 1998, are withdrawn. See Tex.R.App. P. 42.1(c).

DUNCAN, J., dissenting. See Panterra v. American Dairy Queen, 908 S.W.2d 300, 301 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1995, no writ).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal, stating that they have fully compromised and settled all issues in dispute. The motion is granted. See Tex. R.App. P. 42.1(a)(1). Because the cause is moot, all previous orders and judgments, both trial and appellate, are set aside and the cause is dismissed. See Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Hughes, 827 S.W.2d 859, 859 (Tex.1992); Exxon Corp. v. Butler, 619 S.W.2d 399, 399 (Tex.1981); Freeman v. Burrows, 141 Tex. 318, 171 S.W.2d 863, 863-64 (1943); Panterra v. American Dairy Queen, 908 S.W.2d 300, 301 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1995, no writ). Costs of appeal are taxed against the parties who incurred them. The majority and dissenting opinions of this court dated January 21, 1998, are withdrawn. See Tex.R.App. P. 42.1(c).

DUNCAN, J., dissenting. See Panterra v. American Dairy Queen, 908 S.W.2d 300, 301 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1995, no writ).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

966 S.W.2d 729, 1998 Tex. App. LEXIS 1693, 1998 WL 124646, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claridge-v-dream-homes-inc-texapp-1998.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack