in Re Estate of Raymond S. De Leon

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 13, 2001·No. 04-00-00612-CV·Published

Opinion

No. 04-00-00612-CV

Yolanda DE LEON,

Appellant

v.

Jane P. DE LEON,

Appellee

From the Probate Court No. 1, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1999-PC-3365

Honorable Polly Jackson Spencer, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Tom Rickhoff, Justice

Alma L. López, Justice

Catherine Stone, Justice

Delivered and Filed: June 13, 2001

DISMISSED

The parties have filed an agreed motion to dismiss this appeal, stating that they have settled all issues in dispute. The motion is GRANTED. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). Because the cause is moot, all previous orders and judgments, both trial and appellate, are set aside and the cause is dismissed. See Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Hughes, 827 S.W.2d 859, 859 (Tex. 1992); Exxon Corp. v. Butler, 619 S.W.2d 399, 399 (Tex. 1981); Freeman v. Burrows, 141 Tex. 318, 171 S.W.2d 863, 863-64 (1943); Panterra Corp. v. American Dairy Queen, 908 S.W.2d 300, 301 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1995, no writ). Costs of appeal are taxed against the parties who incurred them.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Estate of Raymond S. De Leon, (Tex. Ct. App. 2001).

in Re Estate of Raymond S. De Leon (in Re Estate of Raymond S. De Leon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Exxon Corp. v. Butler
619 S.W.2d 399 (Texas Supreme Court, 1981)
Panterra Corp. v. American Dairy Queen
908 S.W.2d 300 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1995)
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, & Smith, Inc. v. Hughes
827 S.W.2d 859 (Texas Supreme Court, 1992)
Freeman v. Burrows
171 S.W.2d 863 (Texas Supreme Court, 1943)