Edward R. Marden Corp. v. United States

200 Ct. Cl. 759, 194 Ct. Cl. 799
CourtUnited States Court of Claims
DecidedMay 14, 1971
DocketNo. 154-70
StatusPublished
Cited by37 cases

This text of 200 Ct. Cl. 759 (Edward R. Marden Corp. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Edward R. Marden Corp. v. United States, 200 Ct. Cl. 759, 194 Ct. Cl. 799 (cc 1971).

Opinion

On May 14,1971 a decision of this court was entered affirming the commissioner’s order granting plaintiff’s motion for a trial. Thereafter, the case came before the court on a stipulation of the parties stating that a ¡written offer was submitted by plaintiff to the Attorney General and duly accepted on behalf of defendant, whereby plaintiff agreed to accept the sum of $1,150,000 in full settlement of all claims set forth in the petition, and defendant consented to entry of judgment in that amount and released plaintiff from any and all liability, contractual, tort or otherwise, known or that should have been known, arising out of the performance of the subject contract and the collapse and reconstruction of the hangar, and which could have been asserted in this litigation by way of counterclaim or offset, including, but not limited to, claims for liquidated damages. On February 22, 1973 the court entered judgment for plaintiff in the sum of $1,150,000.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harry Pepper and Associates, Inc.
Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals, 2021
Keeter Trading Co. v. United States
79 Fed. Cl. 243 (Federal Claims, 2007)
PCL Construction Services, Inc. v. United States
47 Fed. Cl. 745 (Federal Claims, 2000)
Becho, Inc. v. United States
47 Fed. Cl. 595 (Federal Claims, 2000)
Maine Yankee Atomic Power Co. v. United States
225 F.3d 1336 (Federal Circuit, 2000)
Northern States Power Co. v. United States
43 Cont. Cas. Fed. 77,450 (Federal Claims, 1999)
Yankee Atomic Electric Co. v. United States
42 Cont. Cas. Fed. 77,396 (Federal Claims, 1998)
ThermoCor, Inc. v. United States
40 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,955 (Federal Claims, 1996)
Ralph L. Jones Co. v. United States
33 Fed. Cl. 327 (Federal Claims, 1995)
Brighton Village Associates v. United States
31 Fed. Cl. 324 (Federal Claims, 1994)
Miller Elevator Co. v. United States
39 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,635 (Federal Claims, 1994)
Mega Construction Co. v. United States
39 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,564 (Federal Claims, 1993)
Big Chief Drilling Co. v. United States
38 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,418 (Court of Claims, 1992)
Aleutian Constructors v. United States
37 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,203 (Court of Claims, 1991)
Atlantic Dry Dock Corp. v. United States
773 F. Supp. 335 (M.D. Florida, 1991)
Transpace Carriers, Inc. v. United States
36 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,971 (Court of Claims, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
200 Ct. Cl. 759, 194 Ct. Cl. 799, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edward-r-marden-corp-v-united-states-cc-1971.