Damous Nettles v. Randy Grounds

810 F.3d 1138, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 903, 2016 WL 386022
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 20, 2016
Docket12-16935
StatusPublished

This text of 810 F.3d 1138 (Damous Nettles v. Randy Grounds) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Damous Nettles v. Randy Grounds, 810 F.3d 1138, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 903, 2016 WL 386022 (9th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

ORDER

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel *1139 opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
810 F.3d 1138, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 903, 2016 WL 386022, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/damous-nettles-v-randy-grounds-ca9-2016.