FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 153
Issuance of writ; return; hearing; decision
28 U.S.C. § 2243
Title28 — Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Chapter153 — HABEAS CORPUS
This text of 28 U.S.C. § 2243 (Issuance of writ; return; hearing; decision) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 2243.
Text
A court, justice or judge entertaining an application for a writ of habeas corpus shall forthwith award the writ or issue an order directing the respondent to show cause why the writ should not be granted, unless it appears from the application that the applicant or person detained is not entitled thereto.
The writ, or order to show cause shall be directed to the person having custody of the person detained. It shall be returned within three days unless for good cause additional time, not exceeding twenty days, is allowed.
The person to whom the writ or order is directed shall make a return certifying the true cause of the detention.
When the writ or order is returned a day shall be set for hearing, not more than five days after the return unless for good cause additional time is allowed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Day v. McDonough
547 U.S. 198 (Supreme Court, 2006)
Ex Rel. Preston Cobb, Jr. v. R. P. Balkcom, Jr., Warden
339 F.2d 95 (Fifth Circuit, 1964)
Michael Wayne Riggs v. J.W. Fairman, Jr., Warden
399 F.3d 1179 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)
Kramer v. Jenkins
108 F.R.D. 429 (N.D. Illinois, 1985)
Alvin Settler v. Yakima Tribal Court
419 F.2d 486 (Ninth Circuit, 1969)
United States of America Ex Rel. Charles Westbrook v. Ross v. Randolph, Warden of the Illinois State Penitentiary, Menard, Illinois
259 F.2d 215 (Seventh Circuit, 1958)
In RE WHITE v. Rhay
399 P.2d 522 (Washington Supreme Court, 1965)
United States of America Ex Rel. James Willie Cleveland 28598 v. Warden, New Jersey State Prison
544 F.2d 1200 (Third Circuit, 1976)
United States v. Circuit Court of Milwaukee County, Wisconsin, Branch Viii
675 F.2d 946 (Seventh Circuit, 1982)
United States ex rel. Hooper v. Ryan
854 F. Supp. 2d 546 (N.D. Illinois, 2012)
Rowley v. Barron
(W.D. Washington, 2024)
Norton v. Barron
(W.D. Washington, 2024)
Wilder v. Whitehouse
(W.D. Washington, 2023)
Werber v. Residential Reentry Manager
(W.D. Washington, 2023)
Harleman v. Warden
(W.D. Washington, 2024)
Roberts v. Payne
(E.D. Arkansas, 2020)
Kuchinskas v. Winkelski
(E.D. Wisconsin, 2019)
Robert L. Strauss v. P. G. Smith, Warden U. S. Penitentiary, Terre Haute, Indiana, and Joseph Shore, United States Parole Board, Robert L. Strauss v. Honorable S. Hugh Dillin, U. S. District Judge
417 F.2d 132 (Seventh Circuit, 1969)
Hurley v. Jess
(E.D. Wisconsin, 2019)
Bradley, Brandon v. Carr, Kevin
(W.D. Wisconsin, 2020)
Source Credit
History
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 965.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§455, 456, 457, 458, 459, 460, and 461 (R.S. §§755–761).
Section consolidates sections 455–461 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed.
The requirement for return within 3 days "unless for good cause additional time, not exceeding 20 days is allowed" in the second paragraph, was substituted for the provision of such section 455 which allowed 3 days for return if within 20 miles, 10 days if more than 20 but not more than 100 miles, and 20 days if more than 100 miles distant.
Words "unless for good cause additional time is allowed" in the fourth paragraph, were substituted for words "unless the party petitioning requests a longer time" in section 459 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed.
The fifth paragraph providing for production of the body of the detained person at the hearing is in conformity with Walker v. Johnston, 1941, 61 S.Ct. 574, 312 U.S. 275, 85 L.Ed. 830.
Changes were made in phraseology.
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§455, 456, 457, 458, 459, 460, and 461 (R.S. §§755–761).
Section consolidates sections 455–461 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed.
The requirement for return within 3 days "unless for good cause additional time, not exceeding 20 days is allowed" in the second paragraph, was substituted for the provision of such section 455 which allowed 3 days for return if within 20 miles, 10 days if more than 20 but not more than 100 miles, and 20 days if more than 100 miles distant.
Words "unless for good cause additional time is allowed" in the fourth paragraph, were substituted for words "unless the party petitioning requests a longer time" in section 459 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed.
The fifth paragraph providing for production of the body of the detained person at the hearing is in conformity with Walker v. Johnston, 1941, 61 S.Ct. 574, 312 U.S. 275, 85 L.Ed. 830.
Changes were made in phraseology.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 2243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/2243.