Home/Ninth Circuit/Damous Nettles v. Randy Grounds

Damous Nettles v. Randy Grounds

810 F.3d 1138, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 903, 2016 WL 386022
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Damous Nettles v. Randy Grounds. Read the opinion of the Court — 830 F.3d 922 →
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 20, 2016·No. 12-16935·Published

Opinion

ORDER

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel *1139 opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Damous Nettles v. Randy Grounds, 810 F.3d 1138, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 903, 2016 WL 386022 (9th Cir. 2016).

810 F.3d 1138 (Damous Nettles v. Randy Grounds) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.