California Statutes

§ 3041.5. — 3041.5. (Amended by Stats. 2015, Ch. 470, Sec. 4.)

California·Code PEN Penal Code - PEN·Title 1.·Part 3. TITLE 1. IMPRISONMENT OF MALE PRISONERS IN STATE PRISONS·Ch. 8. CHAPTER 8. Length of Term of Imprisonment and Paroles·Art. 3. ARTICLE 3. Paroles
(a)At all hearings for the purpose of reviewing an inmate’s parole suitability, or the setting, postponing, or rescinding of parole, with the exception of en banc review of tie votes, the following shall apply:
(1)At least 10 days before any hearing by the Board of Parole Hearings, the inmate shall be permitted to review the file which will be examined by the board and shall have the opportunity to enter a written response to any material contained in the file.
(2)The inmate shall be permitted to be present, to ask and answer questions, and to speak on his or her own behalf. Neither the inmate nor the attorney for the inmate shall be entitled to ask questions of any person appearing at the hearing pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 3043.
(3)Unless legal counsel is required by

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

California § 3041.5. (3041.5. (Amended by Stats. 2015, Ch. 470, Sec. 4.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miguel Rosas v. James Nielsen
428 F.3d 1229 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)
78 case citations
Charles Denton Watson v. Wayne Estelle
886 F.2d 1093 (Ninth Circuit, 1989)
46 case citations
Pearson v. Muntz
639 F.3d 1185 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
20 case citations
Richard Gilman v. Edmund Brown, Jr.
814 F.3d 1007 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
15 case citations
Gilman v. Schwarzenegger
638 F.3d 1101 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
14 case citations
Morales v. California Department of Corrections
16 F.3d 1001 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)
6 case citations
Gilman v. Davis
690 F. Supp. 2d 1105 (E.D. California, 2010)
4 case citations
Gilman v. Brown
110 F. Supp. 3d 989 (E.D. California, 2014)
3 case citations
Atkins v. Davison
687 F. Supp. 2d 964 (C.D. California, 2009)
1 case citations
Martin K. Maurer v. Ron E. Koenig
995 F.2d 232 (Ninth Circuit, 1993)
(PC) Smith v. Janam
(E.D. California, 2020)
Harrison v. Smith
(N.D. California, 2024)
Rosas v. Nielsen
(Ninth Circuit, 2005)
Omar Gay v. Jennifer Shaffer
(Ninth Circuit, 2020)
(HC) Tucker v. Gastelo
(E.D. California, 2019)
Cavalier v. Newsom
(S.D. California, 2020)
Oluwa v. Cambra
98 F.3d 1346 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)
(PC) Gay v. Shaffer
(E.D. California, 2019)

Legislative History

Amended by Stats. 2015, Ch. 470, Sec. 4. (SB 230) Effective January 1, 2016. Note: This section was amended on Nov. 4, 2008, by initiative Prop. 9.

Nearby Sections

7
View on official source ↗