Chapman v. AI Transport
This text of Chapman v. AI Transport (Chapman v. AI Transport) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
John D. CHAPMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
AI TRANSPORT; American International Adjustment Company, Inc., et al., Defendants-Appellees,
Nos. 97-8838, 97-9086 and 97-9269.
United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.
April 3, 2000.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia (No. 94-01666-1-CV- WBH); Willis B. Hunt, Jr., Judge.
(Opinion July 13, 1999, 180 F.3d 1244 (11th Cir.1999))
Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en
banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing
en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's
opinion is hereby VACATED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Chapman v. AI Transport, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chapman-v-ai-transport-ca11-1999.