John D. Chapman v. Ai Transport American International Adjustment Company, Inc.
This text of 208 F.3d 918 (John D. Chapman v. Ai Transport American International Adjustment Company, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
208 F.3d 918 (11th Cir. 2000)
JOHN D. CHAPMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
AI TRANSPORT; AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL ADJUSTMENT COMPANY, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees,
Nos. 97-8838, 97-9086 & 97-9269
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
April 3, 2000
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
(Opinion July 13, 1999, 180 F.3d 1244, 11th Cir., 1999)
Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.
B Y T H E C O U R T :
A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
208 F.3d 918, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 6154, 78 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-d-chapman-v-ai-transport-american-internation-ca11-2000.