John D. Chapman v. Ai Transport American International Adjustment Company, Inc.

208 F.3d 918, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 6154, 78 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,113
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided April 3, 2000·No. 97-8838·Published

Opinion

208 F.3d 918 (11th Cir. 2000)

JOHN D. CHAPMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
AI TRANSPORT; AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL ADJUSTMENT COMPANY, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees,

Nos. 97-8838, 97-9086 & 97-9269

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

April 3, 2000

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia

(Opinion July 13, 1999, 180 F.3d 1244, 11th Cir., 1999)

Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.

B Y T H E C O U R T :

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

John D. Chapman v. Ai Transport American International Adjustment Company, Inc., 208 F.3d 918, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 6154, 78 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,113 (11th Cir. 2000).

208 F.3d 918 (John D. Chapman v. Ai Transport American International Adjustment Company, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chapman v. AI Transport
180 F.3d 1244 (Eleventh Circuit, 1999)
Chapman v. AI Transport
208 F.3d 918 (Eleventh Circuit, 2000)