FEDERAL · 29 U.S.C. · Chapter 14

Congressional statement of findings and purpose

29 U.S.C. § 621
Title29Labor
Chapter14 — AGE DISCRIMINATION IN EMPLOYMENT

This text of 29 U.S.C. § 621 (Congressional statement of findings and purpose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
29 U.S.C. § 621.

Text

(a)The Congress hereby finds and declares that—
(1)in the face of rising productivity and affluence, older workers find themselves disadvantaged in their efforts to retain employment, and especially to regain employment when displaced from jobs;
(2)the setting of arbitrary age limits regardless of potential for job performance has become a common practice, and certain otherwise desirable practices may work to the disadvantage of older persons;
(3)the incidence of unemployment, especially long-term unemployment with resultant deterioration of skill, morale, and employer acceptability is, relative to the younger ages, high among older workers; their numbers are great and growing; and their employment problems grave;
(4)the existence in industries affecting commerce, of arbitrary discrim

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kimel v. Florida Board of Regents
528 U.S. 62 (Supreme Court, 2000)
1,567 case citations
Roger Monette and Doris Monette v. Electronic Data Systems Corporation
90 F.3d 1173 (Sixth Circuit, 1996)
737 case citations
Raygor v. Regents of the University of Minnesota
534 U.S. 533 (Supreme Court, 2000)
283 case citations
Kentucky Retirement Systems v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
554 U.S. 135 (Supreme Court, 2008)
67 case citations
Chavez v. Daimlerchrysler Corp.
206 F.R.D. 615 (S.D. Indiana, 2002)
41 case citations
Hammond v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.
216 F.R.D. 666 (D. Kansas, 2003)
33 case citations
Stone v. First Union Corp.
203 F.R.D. 532 (S.D. Florida, 2001)
32 case citations
Ali Boureslan v. Aramco, Arabian American Oil Co. And Aramco Service Company
892 F.2d 1271 (Fifth Circuit, 1990)
24 case citations
August B. MacEllaro v. Alan J. Goldman, Assistant Director for Technology
643 F.2d 813 (D.C. Circuit, 1980)
15 case citations
Joo v. Capitol Switch, Inc.
650 A.2d 526 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1994)
13 case citations
Fanning v. Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County
141 F. App'x 311 (Fifth Circuit, 2005)
9 case citations
Washington v. District of Columbia Housing Authority
170 F. Supp. 3d 234 (District of Columbia, 2016)
5 case citations
Forrester v. Prison Health Services, Inc.
651 F. App'x 27 (Second Circuit, 2016)
4 case citations
Solomon v. Vilsack
845 F. Supp. 2d 61 (District of Columbia, 2012)
4 case citations
Watson v. Tennessee Valley Authority
867 F. Supp. 2d 1215 (N.D. Alabama, 2012)
3 case citations
Minch v. City of Chicago
213 F.R.D. 526 (N.D. Illinois, 2003)
3 case citations
Sayad v. Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
200 F.R.D. 419 (N.D. Illinois, 2001)
2 case citations
Ithier v. Cadillac Industries Inc.
199 F.R.D. 39 (D. Puerto Rico, 2001)
2 case citations
Winslow v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority
5 Am. Tribal Law 292 (Mohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court, 2004)
2 case citations

Source Credit

History

(Pub. L. 90–202, §2, Dec. 15, 1967, 81 Stat. 602.)

Editorial Notes

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date; Rules and Regulations
Section 16, formerly §15, of Pub. L. 90–202, renumbered by Pub. L. 93–259, §28(b)(1), Apr. 8, 1974, 88 Stat. 74, provided that: "This Act [enacting this chapter] shall become effective one hundred and eighty days after enactment [Dec. 15, 1967], except (a) that the Secretary of Labor may extend the delay in effective date of any provision of this Act up to and additional ninety days thereafter if he finds that such time is necessary in permitting adjustments to the provisions hereof, and (b) that on or after the date of enactment [Dec. 15, 1967] the Secretary of Labor is authorized to issue such rules and regulations as may be necessary to carry out its provisions."

Short Title of 1996 Amendment
Pub. L. 104–208, div. A, title I, §101(a) [title I, §119], Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009, 3009–23, provided in part that: "This section [amending section 623 of this title, enacting provisions set out as notes under section 623 of this title, and repealing provisions set out as a note under section 623 of this title] may be cited as the 'Age Discrimination in Employment Amendments of 1996'."

Short Title of 1990 Amendment
Pub. L. 101–433, §1, Oct. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 978, provided that: "This Act [amending sections 623, 626, and 630 of this title and enacting provisions set out as notes under this section and sections 623 and 626 of this title] may be cited as the 'Older Workers Benefit Protection Act'."

Short Title of 1986 Amendment
Pub. L. 99–592, §1, Oct. 31, 1986, 100 Stat. 3342, provided that: "This Act [amending sections 623, 630, and 631 of this title and enacting provisions set out as notes under sections 622 to 624 and 631 of this title] may be cited as the 'Age Discrimination in Employment Amendments of 1986'."

Short Title of 1978 Amendment
Pub. L. 95–256, §1, Apr. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 189, provided that: "This Act [amending sections 623, 624, 626, 631, 633a, and 634 of this title and sections 8335 and 8339 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, repealing section 3322 of Title 5, and enacting provisions set out as notes under sections 623, 626, 631, and 633a of this title] may be cited as the 'Age Discrimination in Employment Act Amendments of 1978'."

Short Title
Pub. L. 90–202, §1, Dec. 15, 1967, 81 Stat. 602, provided: "That this Act [enacting this chapter] may be cited as the 'Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967'."

Severability
Pub. L. 101–433, title III, §301, Oct. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 984, provided that: "If any provision of this Act [see Short Title of 1990 Amendment note above], or an amendment made by this Act, or the application of such provision to any person or circumstances is held to be invalid, the remainder of this Act and the amendments made by this Act, and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances, shall not be affected thereby."

Congressional Finding
Pub. L. 101–433, title I, §101, Oct. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 978, provided that: "The Congress finds that, as a result of the decision of the Supreme Court in Public Employees Retirement System of Ohio v. Betts, 109 S.Ct. 256 (1989), legislative action is necessary to restore the original congressional intent in passing and amending the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (29 U.S.C. 621 et seq.), which was to prohibit discrimination against older workers in all employee benefits except when age-based reductions in employee benefit plans are justified by significant cost considerations."

Executive Documents

Transfer of Functions
Functions vested by this section in Secretary of Labor or Civil Service Commission transferred to Equal Employment Opportunity Commission by Reorg. Plan No. 1 of 1978, §2, 43 F.R. 19807, 92 Stat. 3781, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, effective Jan. 1, 1979, as provided by section 1–101 of Ex. Ord. No. 12106, Dec. 28, 1978, 44 F.R. 1053.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 U.S.C. § 621, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/29/621.