Chapman v. AI Transport

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Chapman v. AI Transport. Read the opinion of the Court — 180 F.3d 1244
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided July 13, 1999·No. 97-8838·Published

Opinion

John D. CHAPMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

AI TRANSPORT; American International Adjustment Company, Inc., et al., Defendants-Appellees,

Nos. 97-8838, 97-9086 and 97-9269.

United States Court of Appeals,

Eleventh Circuit.

April 3, 2000.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia (No. 94-01666-1-CV- WBH); Willis B. Hunt, Jr., Judge.

(Opinion July 13, 1999, 180 F.3d 1244 (11th Cir.1999))

Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en

banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing

en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's

opinion is hereby VACATED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chapman v. AI Transport, (11th Cir. 1999).

Chapman v. AI Transport (Chapman v. AI Transport) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chapman v. AI Transport
180 F.3d 1244 (Eleventh Circuit, 1999)