Nebraska Statutes
§ 27-601 — Rule 601. General rule of competency
Nebraska § 27-601
JurisdictionNebraska
Ch. 27Courts; Rules of Evidence
This text of Nebraska § 27-601 (Rule 601. General rule of competency) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-601 (2026).
Text
Every person is competent to be a witness except as otherwise provided in these rules.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Iromuanya
719 N.W.2d 263 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2006)
Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Robert Wade and Archway Cookies, Llc, Doing Business as Specialty Foods
485 F.3d 1032 (Eighth Circuit, 2007)
In Re Interest of OLD
499 N.W.2d 552 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 1993)
Hiway 20 Terminal, Inc. v. Tri-County Agri-Supply, Inc.
443 N.W.2d 872 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1989)
State v. Oliveria-Coutinho
291 Neb. 294 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2015)
State v. Daniels
388 N.W.2d 446 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1986)
State v. Guy
419 N.W.2d 152 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1988)
State v. Fletcher
378 N.W.2d 859 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1985)
State v. Oliveira-Coutinho
304 Neb. 147 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2019)
Tuch v. Tuch
316 N.W.2d 304 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1982)
In Re Interest of MB
445 N.W.2d 618 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1989)
State v. Schon
418 N.W.2d 242 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1988)
State v. Wilcox
430 N.W.2d 58 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1988)
Bay v. Bay
(Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2022)
In re Interest of Nyx B.
(Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2025)
Ludtke v. Ludtke
(Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2016)
State v. Reyes
(Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2020)
Greyhound Lines v. Robert Wade
(Eighth Circuit, 2007)
Legislative History
Source: Laws 1975, LB 279, § 34.
Annotations: The question of the competency of a child witness rests largely within the discretion of the trial court, and that determination will not be disturbed in the absence of an abuse of discretion. State v. Guy, 227 Neb. 610, 419 N.W.2d 152 (1988). No abuse of discretion to allow 5-year-old's testimony when conflicting testimony was caused by nature of defense counsel's questions, which created question of credibility and not competency. State v. Miner, 216 Neb. 309, 343 N.W.2d 899 (1984). Except as specifically provided otherwise by the rules of evidence, every person is competent to be a witness about those things of which he has personal knowledge. Tuch v. Tuch, 210 Neb. 601, 316 N.W.2d 304 (1982). Where injured victim of defendant's assault with a gun was defendant's wife, she was competent to testify where the jury had prior knowledge of her condition. State v. Martin, 198 Neb. 811, 255 N.W.2d 844 (1977).
Nearby Sections
15
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Nebraska § 27-601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ne/27-601.