Connecticut Statutes
§ 52-64 — Service in action against state.
Connecticut § 52-64
This text of Connecticut § 52-64 (Service in action against state.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-64 (2026).
Text
(a)Service of civil process in any civil action or proceeding maintainable against or in any appeal authorized from the actions of, or service of any foreign attachment or garnishment authorized against, the state or against any institution, board, commission, department or administrative tribunal thereof, or against any officer, servant, agent or employee of the state or of any such institution, board, commission, department or administrative tribunal, as the case may be, may be made by a proper officer (1) leaving a true and attested copy of the process, including the declaration or complaint, with the Attorney General at the office of the Attorney General in Hartford, or (2) sending a true and attested copy of the process, including the summons and complaint, by certified mail, return
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bogle-Assegai v. Connecticut
470 F.3d 498 (Second Circuit, 2006)
Guglielmoni v. Alexander
583 F. Supp. 821 (D. Connecticut, 1984)
Banerjee v. Roberts
641 F. Supp. 1093 (D. Connecticut, 1986)
Vaden v. Connecticut
557 F. Supp. 2d 279 (D. Connecticut, 2008)
Eiden v. McCarthy
531 F. Supp. 2d 333 (D. Connecticut, 2008)
Gaynor v. Martin
77 F. Supp. 2d 272 (D. Connecticut, 1999)
Credle-Brown v. Connecticut
502 F. Supp. 2d 292 (D. Connecticut, 2007)
LOCAL 749, AFSCME, COUNCIL 4, AFL-CIO v. Ment
945 F. Supp. 30 (D. Connecticut, 1996)
Hubert v. Corrections
(D. Connecticut, 2022)
Li v. Peck
(D. Connecticut, 2022)
Fyffe v. State of Connecticut Department of Correction
(D. Connecticut, 2024)
Hampton v. Judicial Branch
(D. Connecticut, 2019)
Alexander v. Lewis
(D. Connecticut, 2021)
Coke v. Samalot
(D. Connecticut, 2021)
Jusino v. Barone
(D. Connecticut, 2022)
St. Raphael's Hospital v. Crim, No. Cv 96 039 4574 S (Oct. 10, 2000)
2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 12601 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2000)
Mercer v. Schriro
(D. Connecticut, 2019)
Field v. Hartford
(D. Connecticut, 2019)
El v. Whitehead
(D. Connecticut, 2019)
Germano v. Quiros
(D. Connecticut, 2022)
Legislative History
(1949 Rev., S. 7781; 1967, P.A. 656, S. 36; P.A. 82-160, S. 21; P.A. 05-105, S. 1; P.A. 12-133, S. 44.) History: 1967 act deleted reference to service on the attorney general at his office “in the capitol”; P.A. 82-160 rephrased the section and added “or garnishment”; P.A. 05-105 added provision re service “by a proper officer”, designated provision re service by leaving true and attested copy of process with the Attorney General as Subdiv. (1), made a technical change and added Subdiv. (2) re service by sending process by certified mail to the Attorney General; P.A. 12-133 designated existing provisions as Subsec. (a) and made technical changes therein and added Subsec. (b) re service of process in action commenced by a person who is incarcerated. Cited. 195 C. 191. Cited. 206 C. 374. Cited. 217 C. 130. Cited. 228 C. 343. Cited. 2 CA 196. Section concerns civil process, not subsequent pleadings, which are governed by the Practice Book. 91 CA 864. Cited. 43 CS 10.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 52-109
Substituted plaintiff.Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 52-64, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/52-64.