Connecticut Statutes
§ 52-325 — Notice of lis pendens.
Connecticut § 52-325
This text of Connecticut § 52-325 (Notice of lis pendens.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-325 (2026).
Text
(a)In any action in a court of this state or in a court of the United States (1) the plaintiff or his attorney, at the time the action is commenced or afterwards, or (2) a defendant, when he sets up an affirmative cause of action in his answer and demands substantive relief at the time the answer is filed, if the action is intended to affect real property, may cause to be recorded in the office of the town clerk of each town in which the property is situated a notice of lis pendens, containing the names of the parties, the nature and object of the action, the court to which it is returnable and the term, session or return day thereof, the date of the process and the description of the property, except that no such notice may be recorded in an action that alleges an illegal, invalid or def
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Pinsky v. Duncan
898 F.2d 852 (Second Circuit, 1990)
Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. Fitzgerald (In Re Fitzgerald)
237 B.R. 252 (D. Connecticut, 1999)
New Destiny Development Corp. v. Piccione
802 F. Supp. 692 (D. Connecticut, 1992)
Zabelle v. Coratolo
816 F. Supp. 115 (D. Connecticut, 1993)
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Isban
870 F. Supp. 24 (D. Connecticut, 1994)
Eck v. Bauer
(D. Connecticut, 2025)
Ctr., Perf. Arts v. Greater Perf. Arts, No. Spnh 0007-63822 (Nov. 30, 2001)
2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 15547 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2001)
Darrah-Wantz v. Brown, No. Cv91 0119821s (Jan. 20, 1995)
1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 775 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1995)
Bank Leumi Tr. Co. of New York v. Modell, No. Cv95-0146200 S (Feb. 28, 1996)
1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 1365-VVVV (Connecticut Superior Court, 1996)
New Future Developers, Inc. v. Hill, No. Cv94 032 12 46 S (Feb. 6, 1996)
1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 1431-PP (Connecticut Superior Court, 1996)
South Mill v. A. v. Still Hill Dev., No. Cv 96-0563009s (Apr. 27, 1998)
1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 5411 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1998)
Moasser v. Becker, No. Cv 920128759s (Sep. 17, 1996)
1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 5456 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1996)
Gattoni v. Zaccaro, No. Cv 97-0396081 (Mar. 13, 1997)
1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 3230 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1997)
Lewis St. Holding Co. v. City of Hartford, No. Cv98 0577970s (Jun. 21, 1999)
1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 7977 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1999)
South Mill v. A. v. Still Hill Dev. Corp., No. Cv96-0563009s (May 11, 1998)
1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 6176 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1998)
Hansen v. Nutmeg Brewing, LLC, No. Cv 99 042 1272 S (Oct. 29, 1999)
1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 14105 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1999)
Groat v. Essex Savings Bank, No. Cv 97-0081132-S (Sep. 5, 1997)
1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 9151 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1997)
Hyman v. Perillie, No. Cv 97-0405539 (Nov. 2, 2000)
2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 13561 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2000)
Coan v. Dunne
(D. Connecticut, 2021)
R&R Stamford Convenience Mart Corp v. Wilton Motiva Associates LLC
(D. Connecticut, 2021)
Legislative History
(1949 Rev., S. 8057; 1961, P.A. 145; P.A. 81-8, S. 1, 9; P.A. 90-58; P.A. 93-431, S. 9, 10; Oct. Sp. Sess. P.A. 93-4, S. 1, 4; P.A. 96-271, S. 218, 254; P.A. 05-247, S. 2.) History: 1961 act added language at beginning of section specifying applicability to actions “in any court of this state or in a district court of the United States”; P.A. 81-8 added Subsecs. (b) and (c) defining “actions intended to affect real property” and requiring that, in order for a recorded notice of lis pendens to be valid or constitute constructive notice, the party recording the notice shall serve a copy of the notice upon the owner of record of the property; P.A. 90-58 amended Subsec. (c) to add provision re the manner of service of the notice if the property owner is a nonresident individual, foreign partnership or foreign corporation; P.A. 93-431 amended Subsec. (c) to authorize any “proper officer” to serve a copy of the recorded notice, effective January 1, 1994; Oct. Sp. Sess. P.A. 93-4 amended Subsec. (a) to prohibit the recording of a notice in an action alleging an illegal, invalid or defective transfer of an interest in real property unless the complaint or affirmative cause of action contains the date of the initial illegal, invalid or defective transfer and such transfer occurred less than 60 years prior to the commencement of such action, effective November 12, 1993, and applicable to any notice of lis pendens recorded before, on or after said date; P.A. 96-271 amended Subsec. (c) to replace reference to Sec. 33-411 with Sec. 33-929, effective January 1, 1997; P.A. 05-247 amended Subsec. (c) to exempt suits to foreclose a mortgage or other lien, add requirements that party who recorded notice file a copy of the return with the clerk of the court in which the action is brought and that the clerk include the copy in the record, and make technical changes. Application for appointment of a partnership receiver is not an action “intended to affect real estate”. 66 C. 359. Necessity of pleading to take advantage of statute. 91 C. 165. No lis pendens required where a-ttachment made on mesne process prior to 1929 amendment to Sec. 52-285; effect of dissolution of real estate attachment by substitution of bond. 104 C. 289. Cited. 114 C. 92. Effect of deed executed after lis pendens filed. 122 C. 412. Cited. 146 C. 237; 162 C. 26. Application for appointment of receiver, in cases like the present, is not an action to affect real estate within the meaning of statute. 165 C. 675. Cited. 169 C. 638. Statute unconstitutional in that it fails to provide for notice to property owners and a hearing at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner to challenge the lis pendens. 180 C. 501. Unconstitutionality of statute has no effect since judgment has been entered. 181 C. 141. Cited. 183 C. 117. Statute as amended by P.A. 81-8 meets minimum requirements of procedural due process. 189 C. 471. Cited. 209 C. 15; 213 C. 676; 217 C. 24; 226 C. 773. Cited. 10 CA 166; 11 CA 211; Id., 653; 21 CA 32; 31 CA 15; judgment reversed, see 230 C. 807; 32 CA 627; 36 CA 206; Id., 469; 37 CA 698. Section is prospective and does not affect prior interests. 63 CA 164. In foreclosure action in which both defendant and decedent were named, Sec. 52-600, rather than this section or Sec. 52-599, applies. 165 CA 144. Time provisions of statute cannot as matter of law bar court from exercising its discretion under Sec. 49-15 (opening foreclosure judgment), must be read in light of said section and does not preclude opening to make lienor a party. 27 CS 201. Purpose is to avoid harshness of common law rule that every man deemed attentive to pending litigation; related Sec. 49-39 held not condition precedent or jurisdictional, satisfied by actual notice. 34 CS 84. Action for dissolution of marriage is not akin to actions for the breach of ordinary contract, or foreclosure of mortgage or other liens. 36 CS 56. Cited. 38 CS 70; 40 CS 312. Effect of notice of lis pendens distinguished from effect of prejudgment attachment; constitutionality discussed. 42 CS 241. Cited. 4 Conn. Cir. Ct. 13. Subsec. (b): Subdiv. (3): A lease comes within provision of statute. 39 CS 195.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 52-109
Substituted plaintiff.Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 52-325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/52-325.