Connecticut Statutes

§ 5-270 — Collective bargaining. Definitions.

Connecticut § 5-270
JurisdictionConnecticut
Title 5State Employees
Ch. 68Collective Bargaining for State Employees

This text of Connecticut § 5-270 (Collective bargaining. Definitions.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 5-270 (2026).

Text

When used in sections 5-270 to 5-280, inclusive:

(a)“Employer” means the state of Connecticut, its executive and judicial branches, including, without limitation, any board, department, commission, institution, or agency of such branches or any appropriate unit thereof and any board of trustees of a state-owned or supported college or university and branches thereof, public and quasi-public state corporation, or authority established by state law, or any person or persons designated by the employer to act in its interest in dealing with employees, but shall not include the State Board of Labor Relations or the State Board of Mediation and Arbitration.
(b)“Employee” means any employee of an employer, whether or not in the classified service of the employer, except elected or appointed off

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pineman v. Oechslin
494 F. Supp. 525 (D. Connecticut, 1980)
22 case citations
St. George v. Mak
842 F. Supp. 625 (D. Connecticut, 1993)
6 case citations
Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer
455 F. Supp. 1338 (D. Connecticut, 1978)
4 case citations
Appel v. Spiridon
463 F. Supp. 2d 255 (D. Connecticut, 2006)
3 case citations
Lajoie v. Connecticut State Board of Labor Relations
837 F. Supp. 34 (D. Connecticut, 1993)
2 case citations
State v. Administrative Resid. Em. U., No. Cv 00-0598788-S (Oct. 3, 2000)
2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 12272 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2000)
State v. N.E. H.C. Employees Union, 1199, No. Cv-02-0814762 (Jun. 19, 2002)
2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 8203-x (Connecticut Superior Court, 2002)
Bender v. State, No. Cv 98-0575747 (Nov. 30, 2000)
2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 14691 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2000)

Legislative History

(P.A. 75-566, S. 1; P.A. 77-22, S. 1, 3; P.A. 81-457, S. 12; P.A. 82-454; P.A. 86-411, S. 5, 8; P.A. 97-148, S. 1, 8; P.A. 01-103, S. 1; P.A. 05-256, S. 5.) History: P.A. 77-22 deleted legislative branch from definition of “employer” in Subsec. (a); P.A. 81-457 added Subdiv. (g), which defines “managerial employee”, and excluded them from collective bargaining by excepting them from the definition of “employee”, where previously they were specifically excluded if working less than 24 hours per week; P.A. 82-454 amended Subsec. (b) to include part-time employees within the definition of “employee”, where previously they were specifically excluded if working less than 24 hours per week; P.A. 86-411 amended Subsec. (g), removing the percentage cap on the number of managerial employees, and requiring the provisions of Subpara. (D) to be satisfied for any position in the system of higher education to be considered managerial, effective July 1, 1986, and applicable to negotiations then in progress; (Revisor's note: In 1995 the Revisors editorially substituted in Subdiv. (c) the alphabetic indicators (A), (B), (C) and (D) for (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) for consistency with statutory usage); P.A. 97-148 amended Subsec. (b) to include special deputy sheriffs, effective July 1, 1997; P.A. 01-103 deleted former Subdiv. (2) re certain Department of Correction employees, redesignated existing Subparas. (A) to (D) as Subdivs. (1) to (4), and made conforming technical changes; P.A. 05-256 redefined “employee” in Subsec. (b) to include disability policy specialists assigned to the Council on Developmental Disabilities, effective July 1, 2005. Cited. 184 C. 578; 226 C. 670. Subsec. (f): Subsec. not unconstitutionally vague. 204 C. 746. Subsec. (g): Subsec. not unconstitutionally vague. 204 C. 746. Language plainly and unambiguously does not include requirement that managerial employees exercise independent judgment in carrying out principal functions listed in Subdivs. (2) and (3). 296 C. 594. Classification of managerial employees and denial to them of collective bargaining rights survives challenge on equal protection grounds; statute repels vagueness challenge, is not offensive to due process requirements. 40 CS 381.

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 5-270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/5-270.