Connecticut Statutes
§ 49-36 — Liens limited; apportionment; payments to original contractor.
Connecticut § 49-36
This text of Connecticut § 49-36 (Liens limited; apportionment; payments to original contractor.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 49-36 (2026).
Text
(a)No mechanic's lien may attach to any building or its appurtenances, or to the land on which the same stands, or any lot, or any plot of land, in favor of any person, to a greater amount in the whole than the price which the owner agreed to pay for the building and its appurtenances or the development of any such lot, or the development of any such plot of land.
(b)When there are several claimants and the amount of their united claims exceeds that price, the claimants, other than the original contractor, shall be first paid in full, if the amount of that price is sufficient for that purpose; but, if not, it shall be apportioned among the claimants having the liens, other than the original contractor, in proportion to the amount of the debts due them respectively; and the court having j
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Kamco Supply v. Maplewood School Apt., No. Cv98 035 22 95 S (Sep. 19, 2001)
2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 13187 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2001)
S.J. Smith Constr. v. Home Depot U.S.A., No. Cv97 0157414 S (Dec. 1, 1997)
1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 13793 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1997)
Waterbury Landfill Associates v. the Eastern Co., No. 0122318 (Mar. 4, 1996)
1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 1729 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1996)
Gilbane Building Co. v. Stamford Towers, No. Cv91 0118788 S (Nov. 18, 1996)
1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 9029 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1996)
Legislative History
(1949 Rev., S. 7220; P.A. 74-310, S. 4; P.A. 79-602, S. 92.) History: P.A. 74-310 applied provisions with respect to lots, plots of land and development of such land; P.A. 79-602 divided section into Subsecs., substituted “may” for “shall” and “the”, etc. for “such” and made other slight changes in wording. Owner is to be allowed for bona fide payments to original contractor before notice, though made in advance. 27 C. 578. Owner cannot waive defect in notice of intent so as to make lien valid as against others claiming liens. 42 C. 541. Owner not allowed for payments made after notice to him by subcontractor, although he had, before such notice, verbally guaranteed contractor's debts, in performance of which guaranty he made such payments. 43 C. 14. Limitation of amount of liens generally. 73 C. 519. Effect of abandonment of work by contractor. Id., 452; 82 C. 244; 87 C. 686; 89 C. 254. Effect of alteration in original contract; of payment made before notice of lien; of payment made in advance of time agreed on. 74 C. 493; 81 C. 502; 89 C. 254; 131 C. 643. Payment of subcontractor by contractor will not defeat lien of one to whom former has sublet part of work. 76 C. 107. Subcontractor has no greater rights than his principal. 81 C. 632; 82 C. 244; 96 C. 225. Effect of direct payments by mortgagee holding advance payment mortgage to contractor, at request of mortgagor. 82 C. 244. Effect of contract providing for payments as work progresses under which weekly payments are made and contract price is fully paid. 84 C. 487. What constitutes “notice” of subcontractor's lien. Id.; 91 C. 712. What constitutes knowledge in provision for advance payments. 89 C. 262. Right of subcontractors where one gives notice, owner thereafter makes payments on contract, and then others give notice. 92 C. 482. Duty of owner as to withholding payments after receiving notice. Id., 485. No priority between subcontractors under same original contractor. 99 C. 343; 108 C. 243. Cited. 109 C. 364; Id., 554; 113 C. 10; 115 C. 199. Finding of fraud between owner and principal contractor. 111 C. 132. Priority of materialmen over contractor not removed by assumption by owner to pay them. 116 C. 277. In action to foreclose lien of subcontractor, original contractor a necessary party. 118 C. 614. Payments made in advance of the time when they are due under the contract and without notice to the lienor are ineffective as to him in reducing the amount due on the contract. 143 C. 146. Cited. 147 C. 351; 168 C. 371; 169 C. 76; 180 C. 501; 181 C. 592; 182 C. 568. Challenge by general contractor to constitutionality of mechanic's lien statutes discussed. 185 C. 583. Cited. 27 CA 199; 39 CA 122. Defendant, despite having paid general contractor the original contract price in full, still owed general contractor for “extras” and therefore a lienable fund existed and subcontractor's lien was not invalid. 136 CA 184. When the general contractor is not in default, unless there were payments made in bad faith, the lienable fund is the amount still owed by the property owner to the general contractor at the time the property owner receives the notice of the lien pursuant to Sec. 49-34, regardless of whether it continues to make payments to the nondefaulted general contractor. 196 CA 430. Cited. 15 CS 360; 23 CS 380. Cited. 2 Conn. Cir. Ct. 620. Only payments made to original contractor in good faith before notice of subcontractor's lien are allowed owner. 6 Conn. Cir. Ct. 512.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 49-14
Deficiency judgment.Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 49-36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/49-36.