Workman v. State

343 S.W.2d 446, 170 Tex. Crim. 621, 1961 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 5287
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 1, 1961
Docket33075
StatusPublished
Cited by302 cases

This text of 343 S.W.2d 446 (Workman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Workman v. State, 343 S.W.2d 446, 170 Tex. Crim. 621, 1961 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 5287 (Tex. 1961).

Opinion

WOODLEY, Presiding Judge

Appellant was tried in the County Court of Cochran County, before a special judge and a jury, upon complaint and information alleging that he committed an aggravated assault upon Raymond Kuykendall, a special deputy sheriff who was in the discharge of his official duties.

Appellant sought to have the jury instructed to acquit if they found that Kuykendall was not a special deputy sheriff discharging his official duties, but the court submitted both aggravated assault and simple assault.

*622 The jury returned the following verdict: “Guility of simple assault, and we the jurors assess the defendant fine maximum Penalty.”

The judgment rendered and entered recites that the following verdict was returned and entered: “We, the jury, find the defendant Ed Workman guilty, and assess a fine of $25.00 and Court cost of $58.30.”

Following this verdict, the judgment from which this appeal is prosecuted recites:

“It is therefore considered, ordered, and adjudged by the court that the defendant, Ed Workman, be immediately discharged from all further liability upon the charge for which he has herein been tried and that he go hence without day.”

The judgment rendered in effect upheld appellant’s contention that he was entitled to acquittal if not found guilty of aggravated assault.

In any event, the judgment appearing in the transcript is not a judgment of conviction from which an appeal may be taken to this court.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Isiah Thomas Montes v. the State of Texas
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2025
Christopher T. Brady v. the State of Texas
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2023
Leo Rey Bernal v. the State of Texas
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2023
Emanuel Cortez v. the State of Texas
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2023
Alan Perez v. the State of Texas
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2023
Joshua J. Scott v. the State of Texas
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2023
Ismael Castillo v. the State of Texas
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2022
Efrain Valencia v. the State of Texas
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2022
Artavias Chovan Cole v. the State of Texas
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2021
David Greg Gonzales v. the State of Texas
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2021
Juan Lopez Jr. v. the State of Texas
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2021
in Re Joe Ernest Robinson
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2020
Sandro Baladez v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2020
James Williams v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2020
Damon Kendrick Dove v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2020
Artemio Franco Salinas v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2020
Thomas Robert Gilchrist v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2020
John Stewart Mueller v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2019

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
343 S.W.2d 446, 170 Tex. Crim. 621, 1961 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 5287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/workman-v-state-texcrimapp-1961.