Adam Perez v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 28, 2015
Docket03-15-00412-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Adam Perez v. State (Adam Perez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Adam Perez v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-15-00412-CR NO. 03-15-00413-CR NO. 03-15-00414-CR

Adam Perez, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 147TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NOS. D-1-DC-14-100090, D-1-DC-14-100091 & D-1-DC-14-100092 HONORABLE CLIFFORD A. BROWN, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Adam Perez filed notices of appeal seeking to challenge his “convictions” in three

district court causes. However, there are no judgments of conviction in these underlying causes,

only hung-jury orders stating in each cause that the court declared a mistrial.1

With certain exceptions not implicated here, this Court has jurisdiction to consider

an appeal filed by a criminal defendant only after a final judgment of conviction. See Tex. Code

Crim. Proc. art. 44.02 (providing that criminal defendant may appeal conviction); State v. Sellers,

790 S.W.2d 316, 321 n.4 (Tex. Crim. App. 1990) (noting that defendant’s general right to appeal

under Article 44.02 “has always been limited to appeal from a ‘final judgment’”); Workman v. State,

1 The record reflects that the notices of appeal were filed the day before the district court signed the three hung-jury orders. 343 S.W.2d 446, 447 (Tex. Crim. App. 1961) (holding that court’s judgment discharging

criminal defendant from liability was not appealable judgment). Absent any judgments of conviction,

we lack jurisdiction to consider Perez’s appeals. See Ballard v. State, Nos. 01-08-00947-CR,

01-08-00948-CR, 2009 Tex. App. LEXIS 7936, at *2-3 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Oct. 8, 2009,

no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (dismissing one appeal for want of jurisdiction

because underlying cause was dismissed and had no judgment of conviction against appellant).

Accordingly, we dismiss these appeals for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App.

P. 43.2(f).

__________________________________________

Jeff Rose, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Pemberton and Field

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: August 28, 2015

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Workman v. State
343 S.W.2d 446 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1961)
State v. Sellers
790 S.W.2d 316 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Adam Perez v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adam-perez-v-state-texapp-2015.