Daniel Joseph Georgianni v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 23, 2025
Docket09-25-00212-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Daniel Joseph Georgianni v. the State of Texas (Daniel Joseph Georgianni v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Daniel Joseph Georgianni v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-25-00212-CR __________________

DANIEL JOSEPH GEORGIANNI, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the County Court at Law Liberty County, Texas Trial Cause No. 23CC-CR-00870 __________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Daniel Joseph Georgianni filed a notice of appeal in a case that resulted in his

acquittal by a jury. The Clerk of the Court issued a notice to the parties that our

jurisdiction was not apparent from the notice of appeal and warned that the appeal

would be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction unless the Court received a response.

Neither party responded to the notice.

Generally, an appeal may be taken by a defendant in a criminal case only after

a final conviction. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a) (establishing time for appeal by a

1 defendant after a sentence is imposed in open court or the trial court signs

an appealable order). In criminal cases, the courts of appeals have jurisdiction only

of appeals authorized by a statute. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 44.02; Abbott

v. State, 271 S.W.3d 694, 697 n.8 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) (A defendant’s general

right to appeal under article 44.02 has always been limited to appeal from a final

judgment.); Workman v. State, 343 S.W.2d 446, 447 (Tex. Crim. App. 1961)

(Judgment discharging defendant on charge of aggravated assault after conviction

for simple assault was not a judgment of conviction.). Neither of the parties have

shown that the trial court has imposed sentence in open court or signed an order that

may be appealed at this time. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a). 1 Accordingly, we dismiss

the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See id. 43.2(f).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on July 22, 2025 Opinion Delivered July 23, 2025 Do Not Publish

Before Golemon, C.J., Johnson and Chambers, JJ.

1On May 29, 2025, Georgianni filed a notice of appeal from his conviction in

Trial Cause Number 23CC-CR00982. Upon receiving the notice of appeal, we docketed Appeal Number 09-25-00213-CR. That appeal is unaffected by the dismissal of Appeal Number 09-25-00212-CR. 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Workman v. State
343 S.W.2d 446 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1961)
Abbott v. State
271 S.W.3d 694 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Daniel Joseph Georgianni v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-joseph-georgianni-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.