Daniel Joseph Georgianni v. the State of Texas
This text of Daniel Joseph Georgianni v. the State of Texas (Daniel Joseph Georgianni v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-25-00212-CR __________________
DANIEL JOSEPH GEORGIANNI, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
__________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the County Court at Law Liberty County, Texas Trial Cause No. 23CC-CR-00870 __________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Daniel Joseph Georgianni filed a notice of appeal in a case that resulted in his
acquittal by a jury. The Clerk of the Court issued a notice to the parties that our
jurisdiction was not apparent from the notice of appeal and warned that the appeal
would be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction unless the Court received a response.
Neither party responded to the notice.
Generally, an appeal may be taken by a defendant in a criminal case only after
a final conviction. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a) (establishing time for appeal by a
1 defendant after a sentence is imposed in open court or the trial court signs
an appealable order). In criminal cases, the courts of appeals have jurisdiction only
of appeals authorized by a statute. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 44.02; Abbott
v. State, 271 S.W.3d 694, 697 n.8 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) (A defendant’s general
right to appeal under article 44.02 has always been limited to appeal from a final
judgment.); Workman v. State, 343 S.W.2d 446, 447 (Tex. Crim. App. 1961)
(Judgment discharging defendant on charge of aggravated assault after conviction
for simple assault was not a judgment of conviction.). Neither of the parties have
shown that the trial court has imposed sentence in open court or signed an order that
may be appealed at this time. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a). 1 Accordingly, we dismiss
the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See id. 43.2(f).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on July 22, 2025 Opinion Delivered July 23, 2025 Do Not Publish
Before Golemon, C.J., Johnson and Chambers, JJ.
1On May 29, 2025, Georgianni filed a notice of appeal from his conviction in
Trial Cause Number 23CC-CR00982. Upon receiving the notice of appeal, we docketed Appeal Number 09-25-00213-CR. That appeal is unaffected by the dismissal of Appeal Number 09-25-00212-CR. 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Daniel Joseph Georgianni v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-joseph-georgianni-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.