David Lopez v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 22, 2018
Docket04-18-00165-CR
StatusPublished

This text of David Lopez v. State (David Lopez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
David Lopez v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas March 22, 2018

No. 04-18-00165-CR

David LOPEZ, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas Trial Court No. 17-0788-CR-A Jessica Crawford, Judge Presiding

ORDER On March 13, 2018, appellant filed two pro se notices of appeal. One of the notices states he is appealing the trial court’s denial of his motion for bond reduction; the other notice states he is appealing from the trial court’s denial of his motion to dismiss appointed counsel. This court has been advised by the Guadalupe District Clerk that there is currently no judgment of conviction against appellant, and it appears the orders from which appellant attempts to appeal are interlocutory and unappealable. See Ragston v. State, 424 S.W.3d 49, 52 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (holding that courts of appeals do not have jurisdiction to review interlocutory orders unless jurisdiction has been expressly granted by law, and they do not have jurisdiction to review appeals from orders denying reduction or denial of pretrial bond); Workman v. State, 170 Tex. Crim. 621, 622, 343 S.W.2d 446, 447 (1961) (stating that generally appellate court has jurisdiction of appeal by criminal defendant only after conviction).

We therefore ORDER that appellant may file, on or before April 23, 2018 a response showing why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. If appellant fails to satisfactorily respond within the time provided, the appeal will be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). All deadlines in this matter are suspended until further order of the court.

We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on appellant, appellant’s counsel, the district clerk, and the court reporter.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 22nd day of March, 2018.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE, Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Workman v. State
343 S.W.2d 446 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1961)
Ragston, Joshua Dewayne
424 S.W.3d 49 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
David Lopez v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-lopez-v-state-texapp-2018.