Artavias Chovan Cole v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 6, 2021
Docket09-21-00277-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Artavias Chovan Cole v. the State of Texas (Artavias Chovan Cole v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Artavias Chovan Cole v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-21-00277-CR __________________

ARTAVIAS CHOVAN COLE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. 21-37860 __________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On September 3, 2021, Artavias Chovan Cole appealed from an order

dismissing Trial Cause Number 21-37860. After Cole filed his notice, which resulted

in his appeal, the Court instructed the Court’s Clerk to notify Cole and the Jefferson

County District Attorney that the order of dismissal did not appear to be a final

judgment of conviction or an appealable order. In the letter, we requested the parties

to respond to the Court’s jurisdictional inquiry and identify the statute or rule

1 authorizing a court of appeals to exercise jurisdiction over the order at issue based

on Cole’s notice to appeal.

Cole responded to the letter. But the Jefferson County District Attorney did

not. Cole’s letter states the letter correctly states the order “is neither a final judgment

nor an appealable order.” While Cole did not provide all the information that might

be relevant to explaining the trial court’s ruling, Cole’s letter indicates the trial court

dismissed this case because he was convicted in another.

In criminal cases, the courts of appeal have jurisdiction only of those appeals

authorized by a statute. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 44.02; Abbott v. State,

271 S.W.3d 694, 697, n.8 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) (A defendant’s general right to

appeal under Article 44.02 has always been limited to appeal from a final judgment.);

Workman v. State, 343 S.W.2d 446, 447 (Tex. Crim. App. 1961) (dismissing appeal

of judgment discharging appellant because it was not judgment of conviction). The

order from which Cole appeals—a dismissal based on his conviction in some other

case—is not an appealable order. See Petty v. State, 800 S.W.2d 582, 583-84 (Tex.

App.—Tyler 1990, no pet.).

2 Because Cole’s appeal from the order of dismissal at issue is not one of the

appeals authorized by statute, his appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on October 5, 2021 Opinion Delivered October 6, 2021 Do Not Publish

Before Golemon, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Workman v. State
343 S.W.2d 446 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1961)
Abbott v. State
271 S.W.3d 694 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2008)
Petty v. State
800 S.W.2d 582 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Artavias Chovan Cole v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/artavias-chovan-cole-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2021.