Alan Perez v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 10, 2023
Docket04-22-00655-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Alan Perez v. the State of Texas (Alan Perez v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alan Perez v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 10, 2023

No. 04-22-00655-CR

Alan PEREZ, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2020CR0224 Honorable Michael E. Mery, Judge Presiding

ORDER Appellant Alan Perez and the State entered into a plea-bargain agreement under which appellant pleaded “true” to the allegations in the motion to adjudicate in exchange for the State’s sentencing recommendation of five years’ imprisonment. The trial court sentenced Perez in accordance with the agreement and signed a certificate stating this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal” and “the defendant has waived the right of appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). Appellant filed a notice of appeal, and the district clerk filed a copy of the clerk’s record, which includes the trial court’s Rule 25.2(a)(2) certification. See id. R. 25.2(d). We must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record.” Id.

Here, the clerk’s record and the reporter’s record of the motion to revoke hearing establish the punishment assessed by the trial court does not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant. See id. R. 25.2(a)(2). The records also support the trial court’s certification that appellant does not have a right to appeal. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding that court of appeals should review clerk’s record to determine whether trial court’s certification is accurate).

Accordingly, appellant is given notice that this appeal will be dismissed pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure unless an amended certification showing that appellant has the right to appeal is made part of the appellate record by February 9, 2023. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d), 37.1; Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, order), disp. on merits, No. 04-03-00176-CR, 2003 WL 21508347 (July 2, 2003, pet. ref’d) (not designated for publication).

We ORDER all appellate deadlines suspended until further order of the court. We further ORDER the clerk of this court to serve copies of this order on the attorneys of record and the court reporter.

_________________________________ Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 10th day of January, 2023.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dears v. State
154 S.W.3d 610 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005)
Daniels v. State
110 S.W.3d 174 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Alan Perez v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alan-perez-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2023.