Williams v. State
43 S.W.3d 901, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 783, 2001 WL 488956
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 2375 →
Opinion
ORDER
Movant Yusaf Williams appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. State, 43 S.W.3d 901, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 783, 2001 WL 488956 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001).
43 S.W.3d 901 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.