Wertz v. Tampa Electric Co.

83 So. 270, 78 Fla. 405
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedNovember 10, 1919
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 83 So. 270 (Wertz v. Tampa Electric Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wertz v. Tampa Electric Co., 83 So. 270, 78 Fla. 405 (Fla. 1919).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— This writ of error was taken to a judgment for the defendant rendered' upon sustaining a demurrer to the second amended declaration of the plaintiff alleging personal injury by reason of the negligence of the defendant company in operating a street railway car and in employing a motorman for the car.

As the declaration does not wholly fail to state a cause of action, the demurrer thereto was erroneously sustained. See Chap. 6521, Acts of 1913.

Reversed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gregg Corp. v. Burdine
129 So. 868 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)
Carlton v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.
116 So. 870 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1928)
Hawkins v. Shore Acres Properties
112 So. 61 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1927)
Yon v. Pinellas County Power Co.
112 So. 50 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1927)
Munson v. Munson
106 So. 414 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1925)
McDonald v. Exchange Supply Co.
88 Fla. 80 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1924)
Pero v. Corley
100 So. 748 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1924)
Foster v. St. Johns Electric Co.
98 So. 75 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1923)
Boone v. Gay
94 So. 501 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
83 So. 270, 78 Fla. 405, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wertz-v-tampa-electric-co-fla-1919.