McDonald v. Exchange Supply Co.
This text of 88 Fla. 80 (McDonald v. Exchange Supply Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This writ of error was taken to a judgment for the defendant upon demurrer to an amended declaration of plaintiff alleging- personal injury suffered by reason of the negligence of defendant in the operation of machinery in a certain fertilizer factory in which plaintiff, who is a minor, was employed by defendant.
The declaration does not wholly fail to state a cause of action. The demurrer thereto was therefore erroneously sustained.
The judgment is reversed on the authority of Foster v. St. Johns Electric Co., 86 Fla. 338, 98 South. Rep. 75; Peterson v. Daniels Co. 83 Fla. 29, 90 South. Rep. 621; Wertz v. Tampa Electric Co., 78 Fla. 405, 83 South. Rep. 270.
Eeversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
88 Fla. 80, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdonald-v-exchange-supply-co-fla-1924.