McDonald v. Exchange Supply Co.

88 Fla. 80
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 14, 1924·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This writ of error was taken to a judgment for the defendant upon demurrer to an amended declaration of plaintiff alleging- personal injury suffered by reason of the negligence of defendant in the operation of machinery in a certain fertilizer factory in which plaintiff, who is a minor, was employed by defendant.

The declaration does not wholly fail to state a cause of action. The demurrer thereto was therefore erroneously sustained.

The judgment is reversed on the authority of Foster v. St. Johns Electric Co., 86 Fla. 338, 98 South. Rep. 75; Peterson v. Daniels Co. 83 Fla. 29, 90 South. Rep. 621; Wertz v. Tampa Electric Co., 78 Fla. 405, 83 South. Rep. 270.

Eeversed.

Whitfield, P. J., and West and Terrell, J. J., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McDonald v. Exchange Supply Co., 88 Fla. 80 (Fla. 1924).

88 Fla. 80 (McDonald v. Exchange Supply Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Perry Hotel Co. v. Courtney
136 So. 691 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)
Ballas v. Lake Weir Light & Water Co.
130 So. 421 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)
Gregg Corp. v. Burdine
129 So. 868 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)
Carlton v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.
116 So. 870 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1928)
Brown v. Pennsylvania Sugar Company
116 So. 72 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1928)
Hawkins v. Shore Acres Properties
112 So. 61 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1927)
Yon v. Pinellas County Power Co.
112 So. 50 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1927)
Cummings Machine Works v. Clark
104 So. 861 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1925)