Brown v. Pennsylvania Sugar Company

116 So. 72, 95 Fla. 116
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 1, 1928·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The declaration herein does not wholly fail to state a cause of action and it was error to sustain a demurrer thereto and to dismiss the cause. McDonald v. Exchange Supply Co., 88 Fla. 80, 101 So. 28; Cummings Machine Works v. Clark, 89 Fla. 383, 105 So. 100; Hawkins v. Shore Acres Properties, 93 Fla. 670, 112 So. 61; Yon v. Pinellas County Power Co., 93 Fla. 503, 112 So. 50.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. Pennsylvania Sugar Company, 116 So. 72, 95 Fla. 116 (Fla. 1928).

116 So. 72 (Brown v. Pennsylvania Sugar Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Love v. Hannah
72 So. 2d 39 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1954)
Biscayne Trust Co. v. Pennsylvania Sugar Co.
137 So. 147 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)
Biscayne Co. v. Martin
116 So. 66 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1928)