Biscayne Co. v. Martin

Supreme Court of Florida

Biscayne Co. v. Martin

116 So. 66, 95 Fla. 259

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 5, 1928·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Campbell, Circuit Judge:

This case is a companion ease, and similar in every respect, to the case of Charles Deering et al. v. John W. Martin et al., as Trustees of the Internal Improvement Fund of the State of Florida, and A. O. Henderson, decided at this term, wherein the decree of the court below was reversed. See 95 Fla. 116, South. Rep. 54.

Under the opinion above mentioned, the decree of the court below in this ease is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Campbell, Circuit Judge:

This case is a companion ease, and similar in every respect, to the case of Charles Deering et al. v. John W. Martin et al., as Trustees of the Internal Improvement Fund of the State of Florida, and A. O. Henderson, decided at this term, wherein the decree of the court below was reversed. See 95 Fla. 116, South. Rep. 54.

Under the opinion above mentioned, the decree of the court below in this ease is reversed.

Biscayne Co. v. Martin, 116 So. 66, 95 Fla. 259 (Fla. 1928).

Pincite

116 So. 66 (Biscayne Co. v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related