Yon v. Pinellas County Power Co.

112 So. 50, 93 Fla. 503
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided March 12, 1927·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This writ of error was taken to a judgment for the defendant upon demurrer to an amended declaration of plaintiff alleging personal injury suffered by reason of Ahe negligence of defendant in not providing the plaintiff, defendant’s employee, a reasonably safe place in which to work as oiler of 'machinery used in a power plant for generating electricity.

*504 The declaration does not wholly fail to state a cause of action. The demurrer thereto was therefore erroneously sustained.

The judgment is reversed on the authority of Foster v. St. Johns Electric Co., 86 Fla. 338, 98 South. Rep. 75; Peterson v. Daniels Co., 83 Fla. 29, 90 South. Rep. 621; Wertz v. Tampa Electric Co., 78 Fla. 405, 83 South. Rep. 270; McDonald v. Exchange Supply Co., 88 Fla. 80, 101 South. Rep. 28.

Reversed.

Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Strum, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Yon v. Pinellas County Power Co., 112 So. 50, 93 Fla. 503 (Fla. 1927).

112 So. 50 (Yon v. Pinellas County Power Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Greene v. Miller Et Ux.
136 So. 532 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)
Gregg Corp. v. Burdine
129 So. 868 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)
Boyle v. Dolan
120 So. 334 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1929)
Carlton v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.
116 So. 870 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1928)
Brown v. Pennsylvania Sugar Company
116 So. 72 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1928)