Gregg Corp. v. Burdine

Supreme Court of Florida

Gregg Corp. v. Burdine

129 So. 868, 100 Fla. 1751

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedMay 14, 1930

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 129 So. 868 (Gregg Corp. v. Burdine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gregg Corp. v. Burdine, 129 So. 868, 100 Fla. 1751 (Fla. 1930).

Pincite

Opinions

In this cause Mr. Justice ELLIS, Mr. Justice BROWN and Mr. Justice BUFORD are of the opinion that the order of the circuit court sustaining the demurrer should be affirmed, while Mr. Chief Justice TERRELL and Mr. Justice WHITFIELD and Mr. Justice STRUM are of the opinion that the said order should be reversed. When it appears that the members of the Court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether a judgment should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate *Page 1752 change in the personnel of the Court, the judgment should be affirmed. Therefore, it is considered, ordered and adjudged that the judgment of the circuit court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed on the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 So. R. 51.

TERRELL, C. J., and WHITFIELD, ELLIS, STRUM, BROWN and BUFORD, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In this cause Mr. Justice ELLIS, Mr. Justice BROWN and Mr. Justice BUFORD are of the opinion that the order of the circuit court sustaining the demurrer should be affirmed, while Mr. Chief Justice TERRELL and Mr. Justice WHITFIELD and Mr. Justice STRUM are of the opinion that the said order should be reversed. When it appears that the members of the Court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether a judgment should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate *Page 1752 change in the personnel of the Court, the judgment should be affirmed. Therefore, it is considered, ordered and adjudged that the judgment of the circuit court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed on the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 So. R. 51.

TERRELL, C. J., and WHITFIELD, ELLIS, STRUM, BROWN and BUFORD, J. J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

129 So. 868, 100 Fla. 1751, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gregg-corp-v-burdine-fla-1930.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack