Pero v. Corley
100 So. 748, 87 Fla. 448
This text of 100 So. 748 (Pero v. Corley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pero v. Corley, 100 So. 748, 87 Fla. 448 (Fla. 1924).
Opinion
The declaration herein does not wholly fail to state a cause of action, therefore the demurrer thereto should have been overruled. See Wertz v. Tampa Electric Co., 78 Fla. 405, 83 South. Rep. 270; Peterson v. Oscar Daniels Co., 83 Fla. 29, 90 South. Rep. 621.
The judgment rendered on the demurrer is reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Gregg Corp. v. Burdine
129 So. 868 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)
Carlton v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.
116 So. 870 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1928)
Cummings Machine Works v. Clark
104 So. 861 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1925)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
100 So. 748, 87 Fla. 448, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pero-v-corley-fla-1924.